Cool little dialogue between Grady Booch, the software engineer's software engineer, and Charles Cooper from CNET. It's just scratching the surface, and made me think.
Tuesday, October 16, 2007
I didn't hit on this until I read the subtitle in the story:
The company rolled out nine new phones aimed at consumers who are entertainment hungry and fashion aware. [emphasis mine]
My first thought was: entertainment addicted and fashion victims, more likely. My second thought was: I guess you have to do something to keep people buying new phones every few months.
What do I use? A second-hand (I bought it from a friend) Samsung SCH-i730. Great WM5 phone, Pocket PC sized because I like the form factor (MS Reader is too small to use on Smart Phones). Next phone? No idea, but it will be the same form factor...
Monday, October 15, 2007
Interesting ZDNet article, which parrots one of the arguments my wife had over OLPC (One Laptop Per Child). The basic question, as stated in the article title, is whether a laptop will make that big a difference in the hands of a child with no electricity.
Reading the comments, I came across a gem:
Kids in third world countries have already been robbed of their childhood. They face the harsh reality of survival and hunger...
This had to come from someone in the West, probably someone in the U.S. The notion of someone being "robbed of their childhood" is a completely Western and completely modern notion. Having a carefree childhood is a completely modern convenience, like a refrigerator and leisure time. These kids haven't been robbed of anything - they never had a carefree childhood claim to begin with. Even in the West, up until the early 20th century, children worked, sometimes right alongside their parents. Some still do in non-Western countries.
Personally, I find the technological aspects of OLPC interesting, but the politics it spawns and the tripe dribbling from the mouth of neo-socialists who back the project is quite irritating. I'm no advocating doing nothing - doing something to help is always better - but for the love of humanity, stop deluding yourself about it.
Tuesday, October 09, 2007
Tuesday, September 25, 2007
This was a very cool read - light, but cool. Imagine a computer that doesn't rely on the movement of electrons in a conductor/semiconductor, but rather the spin of those electrons. While the article focuses on the heat savings, think of the speed increases as well...
Thursday, July 05, 2007
So to is July 5, 2007, right? 7/5/07, if you live in the U.S. Given the date, the byline linked to below at supercomputingonline.com is just a bit confusing then. Here's my problem...
I've some friends who work for Boeing Aircraft here in Seattle. They have told me that the Dreamliner won't even be unveiled until July 8, 2007 (7/8/07, get it? The 787 unveiled on 7-8-7? Never mind...) Flight tests won't be for a while, and the first delivery isn't scheduled until May 2008.
So aren't the guys at supercomputingonline.com jumping the gun a bit when they call the Dreamliner a "highly successful aircraft"? We haven't even seen the thing yet - until 7/8/07, it's vaporware. Highly successful vaporware, to be sure...
Tuesday, July 03, 2007
A yearly study done by Evans Data, reported by InfoWorld (and being discussed on Slashdot), shows developers targeting Windows platforms fell to 64.8% this year, from 74% in 2006. Developers targeting Linux rose from 8.8% to 11.8% a year ago - seems small until you realize that's a 34% increase, and Windows dropped 12%.
Microsoft's big developer hotness is supposed to be all these great .NET technologies. But the lack of Vista adoption might be putting the brakes on developer enthusiasm because Microsoft is failing to lead the way in showing the end result benefits of it. COM didn't really catch on until Microsoft started demonstrating how hot it was through dogfooding and releasing applications architected on it. With it came a greater degree of modularity and flexibility that they demonstrated compellingly well with IE, Office, Visual Studio, etc. To this day, Microsoft hasn't delivered any real WPF+WCF applications - at least none that a significant number of people care about. They should be pumping out amazing applications that can be showcased on Vista, causing developers to envy and copy them, and causing customers to actually want Vista because of the hotness the developers *and* Microsoft are offering.
I'm not sure how accurate the explanation of the adoption of COM is, but there is a case to be made otherwise. I'm curious how many of you out there are waiting for MS to lead the way to application nirvana...
This is a month-old commentary from Cato, but it's still current in geological time... Basically, it laments the politicization of Google, comparing it to the politicization of Microsoft a few years ago. It's a different view on the Google v. Microsoft battle you hear about amongst lawmakers, and it's dead on.
Wednesday, June 27, 2007
Scientific American has a brief article on Latanya Sweeney, a researcher at MIT who is dedicated to increasing data privacy. The read is interesting, but now I want more on her and her work - when I find it, it comes here.
Tuesday, June 26, 2007
Very cool, if it's real - desktop supercomputing with an easy programming model. The UMD site has the same story, with a direct link to name the technology. I'd rather see the API set the guy has come up with.
Thursday, April 12, 2007
I know it's not tech related, but I have yet to find a geek who hasn't read or enjoyed Vonnegut at some point in time, even if it's just Rodney Dangerfield asking Vonnegut if he read lips in "Back to School".
Thursday, March 22, 2007
Good news for the online world - a federal court threw out the COPA bill (Child Online Protection Act). I love this quote from Senior U.S. District judge Lowell Reed Jr.:
Perhaps we do the minors of this country harm if First Amendment protections, which they will with age inherit fully, are chipped away in the name of their protection.
Brilliant. Absolutely brilliant. It's refreshing to see this kind of thinking in a government official - kinda makes you wonder, though...
Compare this enlightened view from an appointed official to those of your elected officials. I'm not in favor of appointing rulers, mind you, but someone who can think for themselves is a breath of fresh air in government.
Tuesday, March 20, 2007
Back in the days after college, I was a sysadmin for a multi-machine Unix shop. I remember my first week, when I was trying to free some space on the main machine. SOP is to clear /tmp, right? So off I go, logged in as root, and do ls -alF /tmp - filled to the gills. So then I enter rm * to clear it - no worries right?
Of course, I had forgotten one small command - cd /tmp. The good news was that only eight files were deleted. The bad news was that pwd was /. I had blown away the kernel, kernel backup, and a few other critical system files, and I got to pull them off the weekly backup before I got to go home that night. What saved me was using rm * instead of rm -r *. I wasn't fired, but I was chagrined.
On a bright note, at least the only thing I lost was a few hours - it could have been $38 billion dollars...
Monday, February 26, 2007
Read the story, but here's a short summary: A judge in Cali was sentenced for possession of child pornography. The prime mover in this case was a hacker who let loose a Trojan on the judge's computers and found the evidence that was used to garner the guilty plea.
I'm not sure whether to be scared or not here. Vigilantes with time on their hands, an axe to grind, and some coding skills rooting around in my machine for contraband? While I agree that the hacker was not acting on behalf of the government and therefore did not violate the Fourth Amendment, that line can get really blurry really quick. Let's say the evidence found pointed to a victimless crime (drug usage, prostitution, etc), something that is defined as illegal, but has no victim other than the amorphous "society". At what point can any hacker-vigilante say he's not an agent of the government? If you drink the government Kool-Aid, decide to be a vigilante P-I, and follow only your muse to the criminals that turn you on, the only thing missing from a Fourth Amendment violation is a prior government blessing.
And by not prosecuting the hacker (they've already found and ID'd him - Brian Willman in Canada), they're setting a very bad precedent. As mentioned in the article, the tacit approval given opens the door for anyone to do the same thing for any reason as long as the evidence found leads to a conviction. And while a U.S. Attorney has admonished people with a variation of "Don't try this at home, kids", that carries zero weight - we've already erased the old line and now have to figure out where to draw it again. Until the new line is drawn, there will be people trying to push it further and further away from due process and privacy concerns, and closer to a Machiavellian "ends-justifies-the-means" interpretation of illegal activity.
Brad Willman, the hacker in this case, needs to be brought up on charges - let him argue and negotiate and plea-bargain, but he needs to be charged go through the process he set the judge up for. We go after hackers and pirates in other countries all the time - why can't we go to Canada to get this guy? And no, I don't care that he did us all a service (I agree he did, but that's no the point) - the next guy caught in this kind of net may be only a political subversive, or maybe just unpopular. Why does Willman get to decide who has fingers pointed at them?
And in case you're still on the fence, pose the question differently - what if Willman had broken into your home, rummaged around while you weren't home looking for "contraband", and then setup hidden cameras so he could do so whenever he wanted to? His Trojan did exactly that in the judge's computer. Now ask yourself if you want your busy-body neighbor to be able to do the same, and it's all OK as long as they find something to charge you with.
OK, now I'm scared.
Thursday, February 22, 2007
I hate software patents.
Ever since I read about some company owning a patent on XORing a cursor on and off the screen, I've been a software patent hater. Software copyrighting - no problems, no issues. Software patents - nothing but big paychecks for lawyers with more vocabulary than sense.
So, with a disdain for software patents in mind, head to Betanews to read the latest on Microsoft v. AT&T - apparently, lawyers are trying to get the Supreme Court to say that electrons are patentable. The Supremes blaked at patenting photons, though...
Gut reaction? MS got caught with their hands in the cookie jar, and is now trying to redefine "hands" and "cookie jar". I wonder what the backlash will be - if MS wins, then sending copies of Vista CD's overseas won't be a license violation. I'm not sure what MS is trying to win here, but they better be careful what they wish for.
My one wish is that the Supremes do tackle the issue of whether software in patentable. Of course, given their track record the past few years, they may find patents are legal, and that the whole of the American population is in violation and owes fines to AT&T.
UPDATE: More on this case from ZDNet.
Wednesday, February 21, 2007
...must come to an end. And even some not so good things, to think about it.
Anyway, what's coming to an end? Easy - support for old software, of course! In this case, the old software is Windows XP Embedded with Service Pack 1, also called XPE SP1. When is also easy - April 10, 2007 (that's Patch Tuesday in April, for those of you keeping score at home). What this means is that the April Embedded Security Update Rollup CD will be the last one to contain any SP1 specific updates.
Full details can be found on the Embedded Team Blog, as well as the Mobile and Embedded Communications Extranet (also called the ECE). Details on MS Lifecycle Policy can be found on, oddly enough, this Microsoft web page.
Thursday, February 08, 2007
Especially the New York Times.
Oh don't get me wrong - not all papers are crap, and the NYT isn't completely crap. But as anyone can tell you, even a little crap is very noticable, even if you pretty it up with flowers and perfume...
Case in point: Edward Rothstein's article on Windows Vista. Rothstein comes across as an "important art critic", a title I define as being a pretentious fool without being cluttered with actual artistic talent - someone who's made a living of not knowing what they like, but knowing "art". And when he set his sights on Windows Vista, he let loose with so much metaphor and purple prose that I needed a full gallon of insulin to prevent me from entering diabetic shock. (in fact, the only useful biographical info I can find on him is at Wikipedia, and it appears, as a composer, he some artistic talent - I stand corrected)
Rothstein waxes on semi-poetically about the cultural history of Microsoft, the "nightmare" of building his own PC and the "primitiveness" of current technology, but then seems to recover to praise the magic of alpha blending and 3D graphics hardware. All in all, his pretentiousness, the superiority of his chosen naivete, the sheer unadulterated smell of his well articulated, artistically educated bullshit was too much.
At one point, he likens the craft of building a PC to that of old hot rodders, which is actually a good analogy - I don't hot rod, but I build models, and appreciate the work that goes into a real hot rod. But he loses touch with reality when he says how hot rodders could take apart an engine to find out how it works, but modern PC builders can't do the same with circuit boards. What a crock - it's called "digital electronics", Edward, and if I can't pry open the chip to see the traces, I can certainly look up specs and pinouts on the web or in books and figure it out myself.
To add to this thought, just because the less-than-easy to find options for customizing a PC are in the realms of overclocking doesn't mean that's what you're limited to - not every computer runs or has to run Vista, or Linux, or even Mac OS. Head to your local Radio Shack and pick up a breadboard, some components, wires, and a CPU (Motorola still makes them for hobbyists). Given some time and some know how, you can build your own computer, no more or less valid than anything you can buy from Dell. It won't run Vista, but neither does your automobile, and it's got a computer in it, with an OS and various programs.
The more I read of this article, the less I thought of Rothstein and the people who read him. His comments and ideas and bullshit add as much to the science of computers as my dissertation on the construction techniques of a pipe organ would add to the appreciation of Bach's organ cantatas. It's mental masturbation, and the fact that he gets paid to spin mental circles, and people buy into him and his self-serving ideas, just goes to show how pervasive the need for religion - any religion - is.
Wednesday, February 07, 2007
A recent study from the University of Maryland showed that four Linux boxes, left alone for 24 hours and sporting weak passwords, were the victims of some 270,000 compromise attempts, roughly one every 39 seconds. There are some interesting stats in the article, like what accounts were tried the most (root won, duh), what passwords were tried the most (the account name won with 43% there), and what people did once they were in (check configs, change passwords, DL files, run apps, etc).
I reported on a similar study in June 2005, but the focus there was on Windows XP SP2. That story reported an average 34 minutes to worm infection for a random machine on the internet - the 825 successful attacks reported above over a 24 hour period represent a successfult attack every 1.7 minutes, well below the average from 18 months ago, and well below the average lifespan (4 minutes) of a Windows XP box.
Tuesday, February 06, 2007
People who know me, and people who have read the past few entries, know that while I drink the Microsoft Kool-Aid, I also quench my thirst at other water fountains. One of those, for quite a while, was Palm - I owned a Palm IIIc as well as a Handspring Visor. In fact, with the VisorPhone add-on, my Visor was my cell-phone for a while - show me a Pocket PC (not a Windows Mobile smart phone, a Pocket PC) that has a single add-on piece of hardware that turns it into a smart phone. Didn't think so...
Anyway, I had and used Palm devices, and wanted to code for them. After some searching, I found the resources I needed to do it - all free, all open source, all tricky to configure. Oh, sure, I could have forked over the big buck for Code Warrior, but as you may have figured out, I'm a fan of free software and open source - why pay for something when, with some study, know-how, research, and a little configurarion, I can get for free myself?
Of course, there is no end of information on the web on how to program - right now, I can put my hands on 3D gaming tutorials, data-driven web site development, source control concepts, even how to run GIMP. So, I found some sites on programming for the Palm, downloaded the tools I needed, even found a 300+ page PDF file called the Palm OS Programmer's Companion. But none of it was enough - I needed something that wasn't tied to the screen I was trying to code on - I needed a book.
Yes, I'm a book junkie - even better, I'm a book collector. I've got a modest library, say no more than 500-600 volumes, ranging from classics (Twain and Dickens) to sci-fi (Heinlein, Asimov, Dan Simmons, and Robert J. Sawyer) to history to technology. Yes, I buy technology books, even though I know they're out of date the minute they're printed. However, I have an out - I buy a lot of them, and sell the old ones at Half Price Books here in Seattle.
So, I not only found a few books on Palm programming at Half Price, but I sold them there last night (no, I don't do Palm programming anymore - I don't program Apple ][e computers anymore. I've got my limits - go figure). I threw in an old VC 6.0 book as well, and my wife had two older Atkin's books - five big heavy books. They gave us <insert drum roll>: US$3.00 and a 10% off coupon. That went towards buying O'Reilly's Learning GNU Emacs for only $8 (less with the coupon and tax). Retail from O'Reilly? US$39.95. And before you say anything: yes, I know there are free web resources all a bout Emacs I can use. What can I say?
I'm a book junkie. What are you?
Friday, February 02, 2007
Now, for those of you out of the loop, Slashdot is a user-supported blog - you find interesting stuff, send to CowboyNeal, and if it's good, he'll post it for everyone else to comment on. I had seen this same story this morning, so I could have forwarded it on the CowboyNeal, but didn't. Why not?
I didn't think it was interesting.
I've sent stuff to Slashdot before - never had it published. Apparently, no one else thinks my stuff is interesting.
So, why is some stuff interesting and other stuff not? What makes for an interesting choice of subject matter? Or to put more ego into it, perhaps the reason no one reads my blogs is because they're not interesting (the blog entries, not the people...)
Like it matters in a blog - there is no forced consumption here, so read if you want, but for me it's an interesting philosophical question...
Thursday, February 01, 2007
You know, there's a bit of a scuffle going on about Vista needing a good graphics card - apparently, Intel doesn't like the fact that nVidia chips are now more important to Joe Average-Windows-User. I personally don't mind - more memory and a better video card were in the works for me anyway (Blender bogged XP down something fierce, and I wanted better graphics for Dungeon Siege and Neverwinter Nights anyway). Seriously, if you want to bitch, bitch about app compatibility.
I've got a box at home that runs a non-MS operating system on it - yes, it's Linux, specifically Fedora Core 6. What can I say - I'm a Unix guy from way back in college, and I'm a computer hobbyist. This machine sits in my office along with the main XP machine, my W2K3 server, cable modem, and wireless router - only the XP machine is headed. I RDP into the W2K3 box, and the router has an HTML interface I can hit from anywhere on the homenet - that leaves my Linux box. I use Cygwin/X and XDMCP to connect to it from the XP machine. But, if my wife is using the XP machine, that means I have to use my Vista laptop instead. And here's where the trouble is...
Cygwin doesn't like Vista - or is it the other way around? Anyway, bash won't run on Vista under Cygwin, and XDMCP just hangs there - apparently, the X Server won't start under Vista. And it's not just Cygwin - I tried Xming as well, which is a lighter version of the same X11 server, and it doesn't nothing either (at least it's more responsive to close requests.
On a more virtual level, I ran the Vista Upgrade Advisor on my home machine - the HW is all good, but I got a bunch of software compatibility warnings. To be fair, I get many of the same warnings on my work machine, but it's still worrying - it took me a week or so to get my laptop setup with Vista, and that doesn't count all the HW issues (it's a Toshiba Tecra M4 Tablet - requires a new BIOS and I had to wait for updated drivers for a few things to work right). The laptop works wonderfully now, but my wife will have a fit if it takes me a week to get everything setup so she can read email and play her games again. I'll keep you posted on the results...
I guess the practical upshot is: Don't sweat the new hardware. Sweat the multiple downloads and the long hunt for updated drivers and software you'll be doing. Adding memory and a PCI/X video card are cake in comparison.
Friday, January 26, 2007
I've been reading other blogs lately, notably Raymond Chen's Old New Thing, and one thing is clear:
Real bloggers write. A lot.
So, I figure, If I want to be read, I need to write. A lot. Actually, a lot more. But there are two problems.
The first is that I don't seem to have a lot of extra time to devote to a blog. But when I think about that objectively, that's really a crock - I've got plenty of time I waste every day, most of it watching television (yes, I'm a TV baby, and a TV adult as well). I've been wanting to break that habit lately - hell, I quit smoking, why not quit TV as well...
The second is that I don't have a lot to say about XPE anymore. It's not that there's nothing to say - there's lots to say, but others are saying it, and better than I.
So, we'll take a slight change of tack here, and make this blog nominally about XPE, but also about technology in general, and my views on some of it.
First stop - the Zune.
Don't get me wrong - the Zune is a very cool device. My daughter has one, we have never owned an iPod, and I want one myself (once my wife releases the funds for one). I actually have no problems with the device or anyone who owns one - my problem is the entire marketing campaign that states the Zune is a "social" device.
You see, when I was a teenager in the early 80's, there was this really cool device called a Sony Walkman - for you young'un's out there, it was an MP3 player that played cassette tapes. I had one, and used it all the time. The Walkman - and it's distant ancestor the Zune - is not social device. It's actually an anti-social device. When you have one on, you're not being social - you're tuning out. Being social is getting on a bus or a plane and saying to the person sitting next to you, "Hey, how are you? Good to see you! I like the outfit - where did you get it?" Putting on headphones is saying, "I'm in my own world, do not bother me." You might even cap off your anti-social attitude by burying your nose in a book or a magazine - I do this a lot when I'm eating lunch alone.
The point is that putting on a pair of headphones to listen to your own personal life soundtrack is not a social activity, no matter what the marketers would have you believe. Buy a Zune because it's cool, not because you want to be social.
For those of you wanting something about Embedded - we're working on February package. It's a beast as far as the engineering work goes, but it's moving forward.